Who is Being Hired at SeaTac International Airport?

By Julio Sanchez Man giving a thumbs up in a suit

Mohamed Hassan has sent at least 15 qualified applications for a number of open positions at the airport. Who is being hired for these jobs?

Ayak Mithyang has experienced the same thing as Hassan, an Employment Case Worker at the Somali Community Services in SeaTac.

“They say they are hiring but I’ve put in 10 applications for jobs I am qualified for, and I have not received even one phone call,” said Mithyang, one of Mohamed’s clients.

Puget Sound Sage, Working Washington, Unite Here and other community organizations approached SeaTac on Thursday to demand good paying jobs for these workers.

The Seatac Airport is run like many other businesses. Instead of directly hiring employees, the Port of Seattle prefers to subcontract many of their services to other companies, which in turn hire workers for low wage jobs without benefits.

Our goal was to put the Airport Management and their subcontractors on notice that the workers and community are watching what’s going on. We are taking meaningful action to create fair wage jobs with benefits for local families and individuals.

First, our group of about 25 to 30 people went to two of the subcontractors in the airport--Prime Flights and Flight Service Systems--to ask this question.

The workers demanded to see the managers.  “We are here to demand fair treatment,” they said. Suddenly no one was available to talk to us.

Next we visited the ironically named Airport Jobs office, where the applications are received and evaluated.

Here, the manager was also suddenly engaged and unavailable. But we were asked to make an appointment in the future, though that doesn’t help us with good jobs now.

Moments after our questions, they sent a police officer to tell us to get out of there. We left promptly.   But that’s OK, because we will be back and we will continue coming back until we have jobs that allow us all to live with dignity and fair treatment.

For more information: A little history

http://www.historylink.org/_content/printer_friendly/pf_output.cfm?file_id=8920

Seattle City Council: Where are the jobs?

Washington Bus MC talks next to a vote robot by Sara Kiesler

Working Washington got on the Washington Bus at the Candidate Survivor last night to see what our City Council candidates were saying about jobs.

The results: *crickets chirping*.  Not much. But we did get a bit of a bite here and there.

The jobs talk roll: --When asked when she had ever not voted with the majority, City Councilwoman Sally Clark said she opposed the $25-per-employee-per-year head tax because she thought it would stunt job creation. The head tax, which was repealed, would have put $4.5 million toward transportation improvements, notably for bicycles and pedestrians.

--Every single candidate standing on the stage--from candidate Dale Pusey to longtime City Councilwoman Jean Godden--said they supported paid sick days for Seattle workers

--Candidate Michael Taylor-Judd said in response to a question about his stance against the Seattle deep bore tunnel that he instead wanted to spend the billions of dollars designated for the project on rapid transit and jobs

Hopefully, as the races roll on until August 16, when the mail-in ballots are due, we hope to hear more about how our city council people plan to put the 8.5 percent of Seattleites that are unemployed back to work.

Regardless, we had a lot of fun watching City Councilman Tim Burgess rap to the tune of Black and Yellow, and listening to City Council candidate Brad Meecham sing Lady Gaga’s Telephone in Japanese.

A solution to the debt ceiling distraction

All about 'emby Nathan Jackson When you buy something, you pay for it. Somebody forgot to tell Congress that.

With all this talk about debt, default and ceilings one of the most important questions has been ignored: how will this affect you?  Political posturing has become the story of the day, with negotiations being reported like sports statistics by excited commentators.

Unfortunately, there are actual consequences if the debt ceiling is not raised: higher interest rates, more restrictive loan terms, cuts to socials services, and a possible stock market plummet. This is not a sport. The consequences are much more dire.

Let me explain: The debt ceiling is simply the bill for the spending that Congress has already approved and spent in the previous fiscal year, according to PBS.  It is like the check at the end of a meal from a restaurant.  When we eat the food and enjoy the environment, we pull out our wallets and pay the amount owed.  The debt ceiling is simply the country paying for the supper it has already eaten.

The economic repercussions of skipping out on the bill are not completely predictable since the United States in its history has never pulled a “dine and dash.”  Some of the problems that could arise from defaulting on our bills would include a downgrade of our national credit score (the judgment of how good we are for any money that we borrow, or our trustworthiness) as well as sour our reputation as a safe harbor for international financial investment, according to Reuters.  It could also lower the trustworthiness of many states’ credit, making it harder for struggling states to get the assistance they need to strengthen their communities.

How would it affect us here in Washington State? Right now Washington State gets some of its funding from the Federal Government.  If the Federal Government defaults and has to pick whether to pay the electricity or the water bill, then funding to states will most likely be first on the chopping block. In Washington State we receive federal money to support essential services like college grants, K-12 education, Head Start, job training programs, and other social services that many of us rely on to get back on our feet.

With many of us still struggling to find good work and to find safe, reliable childcare, we cannot afford the loss of Federal money in our community.  We have already seen the state budgets shrink with drastic cutbacks in services.  We can’t afford to let ideology overrule rational thought.

****

We’ve been in this fight before, but things are different this time.

The fight about the debt ceiling has been stooped in willful ignorance of history and an attitude that is too optimistic about the possible problems.  Under President Ronald Reagan, the debt ceiling was raised over a dozen times. Under President George W. Bush, the debt ceiling rose more than six times.  This is truly a chosen crisis.

The crisis was created because members of Congress wanted to attach spending cuts to a normally routine legislation. The members of Congress have decided to gamble with our economic well-being to prove a political point driven mainly by ideology about the role of government.

But here are the facts. We could end this problem with a simple, clean bill to raise the debt ceiling. We could stop with the posturing and the speeches and simply get it done in order to avoid economic uncertainty.  When the check comes, you pay it.  It is not that complicated.

Sources: The Olympian Washington State Budget and Policy Center Reuters Think Progress Washington Post The Seattle Times CBS News ABC News

Rebuilding the American Dream

How 10 people created change in their neighborhood by Julio A Sanchez

It is not enough to talk about how upset we are by the direction the country is going.  Our actions need to support our beliefs, and I believe we have to come together and work on meaningful steps to fix what we perceive to be wrong.

Young girl wearing an American flag-like hat

Last week an estimated 20,000 people did just that. Those concerned with the state of our Nation decided to come together in 1,500 house meetings sponsored by Move ON.

A total of 10 people came to the meeting I attended.  We where a diverse group:  white, Asian, Latino, men, women, gay, straight, working professionals, retired and underemployed.

I was one of those people. We all expressed it a little different, but we where there because we believed in the need to rebuild the American Dream, a dream based on fairness, not on attacks to the poor and middle class while the rich get tax loopholes for jets and capital gains.  A dream whose final goal is equality and good jobs, not dissension and privilege.

During the meeting we shared personal stories about how the recession has affected us and our families and reminded ourselves moments when we have been proud of our country or our communities.  Next we voted on a number of ideas to rebuild the American Dream that have been gathered by means of public contribution.  Out of these ideas, those chosen will be moved forward as the cornerstones of a campaign to rebuild the dream.

At the end we left with a meaningful commitment to take a specific step to engage others in this process.   My commitment was to talk to 5 other people about the Summer Leadership Conference and the Progressive Speak Out, a community event 700 people attended.

If you host your own meeting, the mechanics are rather simple:  dedicate about two hours, tell friends to come by, it can be a potluck!  Set an agenda with time for introductions and then get to work.

Would you like to organize your own house meeting? Click here: http://action.workingwa.org/page/s/houseparty

Do you want to vote on the ideas to rebuild the American Dream? Click here: http://contract.rebuildthedream.com/

Underfunding Schools Leads to Ritalin

by Sandra VanderVen My American Dream is that our country will value education enough to properly fund it. That way, no matter how much money a kid’s parents have, they have the same shot at success as everyone else.

What is your American Dream?

young boy writing with a pencil

Last weekend, there were 1,500 meetings all over the country to determine what We The People want the American Dream to look like, and how to make it a reality.  It is just what our country needs, and I’m excited to be a part of it.

Chatting with one of the meeting hosts, I mentioned that I’m disappointed that I have to push my son to succeed in school to a degree that I consider unbalanced and unhealthy, because I’ve realized that the more scholarship money he can get, the less crushing his debts will be after college.

It turned out we were both unhappily turning our backs on our own values because of the economic conditions we find ourselves in.

The choice before my new acquaintance, as a parent of a kid with Attention Deficit Disorder, was whether or not to give her child Ritalin. This drug is addictive. It lowers a child’s appetite, sometimes impeding growth. One can imagine that in general, parents would prefer not to use it.

She ended up deciding to give her child Ritalin, and here’s why. The public schools where she lives have been limping along, chronically underfunded, for decades. There are just not enough adults in the room to give each kid access to a robust education.

It’s even harder for what teachers they have left if the kids aren’t all marching to the same beat.

She decided that even though she doesn’t know what the long term effects will be (No one knows. Ritalin hasn’t been around long enough to find out), the situation was urgent. Her son was failing. His future was in jeopardy.

Schools with more resources offer an environment that allows kids to flourish.  Without these resources, kids who don’t have a fall-back will end up with more disciplinary referrals and lower achievement, and more of them will end up medicated.  Our schools rely on taxes, and when greedy corporations aren’t paying enough, our kids suffer.

I told a child psychologist I know about this conversation, and asked for his take on it.  He told me that if you are rich, you can hire a tutor, you can enroll your kid in a costly program with smaller class sizes, you can do all sorts of things that help the situation, possibly preventing you from having to medicate your kid.

With the cuts in education funding we’re seeing in Washington State right now, kids with ADD that come from poorer families are going to end up in trouble more and medicated more than their classmates whose parents can afford tutors and other interventions. That’s not right.

Now I’m embarrassed that I even mentioned having to push my son more than I’d like to.  It is nothing compared to drugging your kid as a path to academic success.

Standing alone, the choices look stark: failure or drugs.  If we stand together and push our legislators to close tax loopholes for the rich and end subsidies for greedy corporations, we can expand our choices, gaining the ability to make real decisions about what is best for our kids: Staffing levels for public schools that give every kid a chance to thrive.
--

Who We Are -- Shawna L.

Hi. I’m Shawna and I moved here for a better life for my children.  I couldn’t find any work in Oregon and I came here to Washington hoping for a better chance. I had to get my sons out of the situation we were in, and even though it was really tough to move, I had to do it. When I got to Washington I had some trouble finding work, but I got a job at the packaging company, and I work overtime as much as possible just to get by. I asked my mom to move in with us to take care of the kids because I can’t afford child care. We're in Section 8 housing. Services are getting taken away and these budget cuts are making us choose between food and childcare. I chose food.

It's not fair what's happening. I’m so sick of services to the rest of us being cut while big corporations don’t even have to pay taxes.  I pay my taxes even though I really can’t afford it, but they don’t have to.  That’s wrong and that’s why I’m with Working Washington.

There’s no reason why big corporations should get away with paying nothing.  It’s time for it to be fair.